PolicyBench
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google · AI alone, no tools
United States rank
#12 of 32
US exact
79.2%
United States
United States benchmark
Exact match
79.2%
Bounded score
91.5%
Parse rate
100.0%
Eligibility flags
964/984
Score by programhardest first
| Program | Exact | Within 1% | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal tax before refundable credits | 47.0% | 48.0% | 100 |
| State tax before refundable credits | 60.0% | 63.0% | 100 |
| Payroll tax | 71.0% | 71.0% | 100 |
| SNAP | 78.0% | 79.0% | 100 |
| State refundable credits | 81.0% | 80.0% | 100 |
| Federal refundable credits | 84.0% | 86.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Medicaid eligibility | 96.0% | 96.0% | 177 |
| SSI | 97.0% | 98.0% | 100 |
| Person-level CHIP eligibility | 97.2% | 97.2% | 177 |
| Person-level Medicare eligibility | 97.7% | 97.7% | 177 |
| Reduced-price school meals eligibility | 98.0% | 98.0% | 100 |
| Free school meals eligibility | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| TANF | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| Person-level WIC eligibility | 99.4% | 99.4% | 177 |
| Local income tax | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Early Head Start eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 38 |
| Person-level Head Start eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 38 |
| Self-employment tax | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100 |
Hardest casesworst misses on positive references
- SNAP675% offReference $461 · predicted $3,576Inspect household #023
- Federal tax before refundable credits600% offReference $1,346 · predicted $9,414Inspect household #039
- Federal tax before refundable credits482% offReference $1,910 · predicted $11,116Inspect household #068
- Federal tax before refundable credits445% offReference $500 · predicted $2,722Inspect household #046
- State tax before refundable credits373% offReference $285 · predicted $1,348Inspect household #042
- State tax before refundable credits287% offReference $514 · predicted $1,990Inspect household #039
Scores are from the frozen manuscript snapshot under the AI-alone condition: one structured response per household, no tools, graded against PolicyEngine reference outputs. See the leaderboard and paper for methodology.