PolicyBench
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google · AI alone, no tools
United States rank
#8 of 26
US exact
79.0%
United States
United States benchmark
Exact match
79.0%
Bounded score
93.4%
Parse rate
100.0%
Eligibility flags
965/984
Score by programhardest first
| Program | Exact | Within 1% | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal tax before refundable credits | 49.0% | 50.0% | 100 |
| State tax before refundable credits | 55.0% | 58.0% | 100 |
| Payroll tax | 70.0% | 71.0% | 100 |
| SNAP | 79.0% | 79.0% | 100 |
| State refundable credits | 80.0% | 80.0% | 100 |
| Federal refundable credits | 88.0% | 90.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Medicaid eligibility | 94.9% | 94.9% | 177 |
| SSI | 97.0% | 98.0% | 100 |
| Person-level CHIP eligibility | 97.2% | 97.2% | 177 |
| Person-level Medicare eligibility | 98.3% | 98.3% | 177 |
| Free school meals eligibility | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| Reduced-price school meals eligibility | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| TANF | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| Local income tax | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Early Head Start eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 38 |
| Person-level Head Start eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 38 |
| Person-level WIC eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 177 |
| Self-employment tax | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100 |
Hardest casesworst misses on positive references
- State tax before refundable credits3107% offReference $7 · predicted $218Inspect household #023
- Federal tax before refundable credits429% offReference $1,346 · predicted $7,117Inspect household #039
- SNAP329% offReference $461 · predicted $1,980Inspect household #023
- State tax before refundable credits294% offReference $514 · predicted $2,029Inspect household #039
- Federal tax before refundable credits272% offReference $500 · predicted $1,858Inspect household #046
- Federal tax before refundable credits221% offReference $5,200 · predicted $16,711Inspect household #123
Scores are from the frozen manuscript snapshot under the AI-alone condition: one structured response per household, no tools, graded against PolicyEngine reference outputs. See the leaderboard and paper for methodology.