PolicyBench
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Google · AI alone, no tools
United States rank
#10 of 23
US exact
76.9%
United States
United States benchmark
Exact match
76.9%
Bounded score
90.5%
Parse rate
100.0%
Eligibility flags
966/984
Score by programhardest first
| Program | Exact | Within 1% | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal tax before refundable credits | 46.0% | 47.0% | 100 |
| State tax before refundable credits | 55.0% | 57.0% | 100 |
| Payroll tax | 65.0% | 67.0% | 100 |
| SNAP | 76.0% | 77.0% | 100 |
| State refundable credits | 80.0% | 80.0% | 100 |
| Federal refundable credits | 84.0% | 85.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Medicaid eligibility | 95.5% | 95.5% | 177 |
| SSI | 96.0% | 96.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Medicare eligibility | 96.6% | 96.6% | 177 |
| Local income tax | 98.0% | 98.0% | 100 |
| Reduced-price school meals eligibility | 98.0% | 98.0% | 100 |
| Self-employment tax | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| TANF | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| Person-level CHIP eligibility | 99.4% | 99.4% | 177 |
| Person-level WIC eligibility | 99.4% | 99.4% | 177 |
| Free school meals eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Early Head Start eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 38 |
| Person-level Head Start eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 38 |
Hardest casesworst misses on positive references
- Federal tax before refundable credits723% offReference $1,346 · predicted $11,070Inspect household #039
- Federal tax before refundable credits722% offReference $500 · predicted $4,108Inspect household #046
- SNAP657% offReference $461 · predicted $3,492Inspect household #023
- State tax before refundable credits287% offReference $514 · predicted $1,990Inspect household #039
- State tax before refundable credits205% offReference $1,028 · predicted $3,135Inspect household #122
- State tax before refundable credits188% offReference $285 · predicted $820Inspect household #042
Scores are from the frozen manuscript snapshot under the AI-alone condition: one structured response per household, no tools, graded against PolicyEngine reference outputs. See the leaderboard and paper for methodology.