PolicyBench
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek · AI alone, no tools
United States rank
#14 of 23
US exact
76.1%
United States
United States benchmark
Exact match
76.1%
Bounded score
89.5%
Parse rate
100.0%
Eligibility flags
962/984
Score by programhardest first
| Program | Exact | Within 1% | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal tax before refundable credits | 41.0% | 42.0% | 100 |
| State tax before refundable credits | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100 |
| Payroll tax | 68.0% | 73.0% | 100 |
| SNAP | 79.0% | 79.0% | 100 |
| State refundable credits | 79.0% | 79.0% | 100 |
| Federal refundable credits | 85.0% | 86.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Medicaid eligibility | 93.8% | 93.8% | 177 |
| SSI | 96.0% | 97.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Head Start eligibility | 97.4% | 97.4% | 38 |
| Free school meals eligibility | 98.0% | 98.0% | 100 |
| Person-level CHIP eligibility | 98.3% | 98.3% | 177 |
| Person-level Medicare eligibility | 98.3% | 98.3% | 177 |
| Reduced-price school meals eligibility | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| Self-employment tax | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| TANF | 99.0% | 99.0% | 100 |
| Person-level WIC eligibility | 99.4% | 99.4% | 177 |
| Local income tax | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100 |
| Person-level Early Head Start eligibility | 100.0% | 100.0% | 38 |
Hardest casesworst misses on positive references
- SNAP675% offReference $461 · predicted $3,576Inspect household #023
- Federal tax before refundable credits637% offReference $1,346 · predicted $9,915Inspect household #039
- State tax before refundable credits627% offReference $514 · predicted $3,740Inspect household #039
- Federal tax before refundable credits526% offReference $1,910 · predicted $11,956Inspect household #068
- Federal tax before refundable credits321% offReference $500 · predicted $2,102Inspect household #046
- State tax before refundable credits227% offReference $1,253 · predicted $4,102Inspect household #068
Scores are from the frozen manuscript snapshot under the AI-alone condition: one structured response per household, no tools, graded against PolicyEngine reference outputs. See the leaderboard and paper for methodology.